Posted by tangobob on February 26, 1999 at 11:23:07:
I really like what I've read of Nietzsche, but I tend to
think of him as a living example of Dostoevsky's character
Raskolnikov with a more realistic ending than Crime and
Punishment's strainedly optimistic ending.
I think Nietzsche could be considered existential in the sense
that he was less concerned with abstract, solopsistic forms
and more concerned with real problems that analytic philosophers
seemed afraid to address. In this sense, I think Kierkegaard would
would round out the rigid Platonic triangle which seems increasingly
anachronistic, even in the analytic and positivist guises of today.
As far as religion being dead, I think N.'s insight was similar to
Kierkegaard's--but in essence no different than Christ's: hypocrisy
in organized religion is the prevalent enemy. I admire N.'s drive to
define the authentic overman. But I think the paradox was that he
couldn't quite live it, as Raskolnikov couldn't. If either one had less
intellectual intregrity, they would've been much less troubled with
their own ideas. But the schism between their essential ideal and
their real self were too obvious to ignore. Ultimately, the extraordinary
man would have motivations free of resentment. But I don't think either
character achieved this state of mind. I don't think Kierkegaard did either
though--he always seemed to have a little bit of a chip on his shoulder
towards the inhabitants of Christendom, which I understand all too well....
I think Dostoevsky was less resentful, although he obviously had his own
share of chips. But somehow, Dostoevsky's writings seem more honest and
less didactic than Kierkegaard's. Which is why I think Nietzsche respected
Dostoevsky even though their views regarding God were quite different.
Which is something my not-so-extraordinary self envies--why can't Christians
be more honest and earn more respect from agnostics and atheists today?
But here is a key difference I'll admit between Raskolnikov's extra-ordinary
man and Nietzsche's overman: the extraordinary man wouldn't be explicitly
above envy, whereas the overman would not give room to envy, but act on
achieving a solution. But I think this is what the sincere follower of Christ
would do too. . . .
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[Shakespeare Forums]
[Bible Forums]